Google and Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba have been busy in the war of words over Android for the last few days and it does not seem to stop. On one hand, Google is claiming Alibaba's Aliyun OS is a non-compatible version of Android, while Alibaba states that Aliyun is built on open-source Linux and it has its own applications and has nothing to do with Android.How did it begin?
It all started with the abrupt cancellation of Acer's smartphone launch in China. Powered by Alibaba's Aliyun OS, the Acer CloudMobile A800 was set to be announced on Thursday in Shanghai, but was postponed indefinitely at the last minute because of Google's alleged interference. Alibaba told in a statement that Acer "was notified by Google that if the product runs Aliyun OS, Google will terminate its Android-related cooperation and other technology licensing with our partner....We regret Google's action."
Google, which was initially silent on the matter, later came out with a statement, but did not clearly state that it had anything to do with the cancellation of the Acer smartphone launch. However it made it clear that operating systems like Aliyun were not good for the Android ecosystem.
OHA was created in 2007 along with Android and is a group of 84 technology and mobile companies, which are committed to Android and to commercially deploy handsets and services using the Android platform, as stated on OHA website. Acer, which is at the centre of current controversy, became a part of OHA on June 1, 2009 and it also noted similar commitment to Android in the press release issued at the time of joining OHA.
Because it is about the policy and repercussions of such operating systems, which allow Android applications to work on them and in turn lead to piracy of Android apps. The pirated Android apps can easily be seen in the Aliyun app store. It contains pirated copies of Google's applications and a lot of other popular games and apps like Temple Run. So, Google is right that as an OHA member Acer should not support such operating systems, which are harmful for the Android ecosystem.
Google SVP of Mobile and Android boss Andy Rubin posted on Google+ voicing the compatibility concerns:
As expected Google and Andy Rubin's response did not go well with Alibaba, which was already not happy with the smartphone cancellation and John Spelich, Alibaba's VP of international corporate affairs, came out in strong words and even questioned the openness of Android:
What is Android and how much of it is Google?
There are currently many Androids floating all around us. The Amazon Android in Kindle Fire, or Barnes & Noble's Android in Nook Tablet or several such and then there's Google's Android, which has access to Google Play and other Google services and can use the Android logo.
The whole point of providing Android source under Apache v2 Open Source license is such that Android will rise every day and that is the beauty of the Android Open Source Project (AOSP).
But, it is high time Google made a clear distinction. The so-called compatible Android or Google's Android, needs to called that and the AOSP Android needs a separate name, as Marketing Land pointed out in a recent article.
Recent actions like renaming Android Market to Google Play are crying out loud for such change.
But, the war of words did not stop at Alibaba's statement, Andy Rubin replied to Spelich's comments on Google+ and also raised the piracy issue:
Despite being derived from the Android code, all these operating systems are not Android (or let's say not compatible with Android) but are emerging as the biggest competitors for Google's Android in China. Google does not want that thus all this brouhaha over a smartphone launch.
It all started with the abrupt cancellation of Acer's smartphone launch in China. Powered by Alibaba's Aliyun OS, the Acer CloudMobile A800 was set to be announced on Thursday in Shanghai, but was postponed indefinitely at the last minute because of Google's alleged interference. Alibaba told in a statement that Acer "was notified by Google that if the product runs Aliyun OS, Google will terminate its Android-related cooperation and other technology licensing with our partner....We regret Google's action."
Google, which was initially silent on the matter, later came out with a statement, but did not clearly state that it had anything to do with the cancellation of the Acer smartphone launch. However it made it clear that operating systems like Aliyun were not good for the Android ecosystem.
Compatibility is at the heart of the Android ecosystem and ensures a consistent experience for developers, manufacturers and consumers.So, what is OHA or Open Handset Alliance?
Non-compatible versions of Android, like Aliyun, weaken the ecosystem. All members of the Open Handset Alliance have committed to building one Android platform and to not ship non-compatible Android devices.
This does not however, keep OHA members from participating in competing ecosystems.
OHA was created in 2007 along with Android and is a group of 84 technology and mobile companies, which are committed to Android and to commercially deploy handsets and services using the Android platform, as stated on OHA website. Acer, which is at the centre of current controversy, became a part of OHA on June 1, 2009 and it also noted similar commitment to Android in the press release issued at the time of joining OHA.
As a member of the Open Handset Alliance, Acer will work with its members to contribute to the development of the Android platform and bring consumers a far better user experience than much of what is available on today's mobile platforms. By joining the Open Handset Alliance, Acer demonstrates its support for Android as an open mobile platform and its commitment to Android's commercial success.So, clearly as OHA member Acer is bound to work for the betterment of Android but can also work on competing ecosystems, but as Google has no problem with it working with other platforms like Windows Mobile, then why with Aliyun? If Alibaba does not claim or want Aliyun to be officially an Android compatible version and whether Aliyun is good or bad, why should Google have to worry about it?
Because it is about the policy and repercussions of such operating systems, which allow Android applications to work on them and in turn lead to piracy of Android apps. The pirated Android apps can easily be seen in the Aliyun app store. It contains pirated copies of Google's applications and a lot of other popular games and apps like Temple Run. So, Google is right that as an OHA member Acer should not support such operating systems, which are harmful for the Android ecosystem.
Google SVP of Mobile and Android boss Andy Rubin posted on Google+ voicing the compatibility concerns:We were surprised to read Alibaba Group's chief strategy officer Zeng Ming's quote "We want to be the Android of China" when in fact the Aliyun OS incorporates the Android run-time and was apparently derived from Android.He also published a detailed blog post on the official Android blog regarding the importance of compatibility in Android and also made a major point towards the current controversy:
Based on our analysis of the apps available at http://apps.aliyun.com, the platform tries to, but does not succeed in being compatible.
It's easy to be Android compatible, the OHA supplies all the tools and details on how to do it.
While Android remains free for anyone to use as they would like, only Android compatible devices benefit from the full Android ecosystem. By joining the Open Handset Alliance, each member contributes to and builds one Android platform -- not a bunch of incompatible versions.Rubin even gave an example of how non-compatible devices can harm the ecosystem:
Imagine a hypothetical situation where the platform on each phone sold was just a little bit different. Different enough where Google Maps would run normally on one phone but run terribly slow on another. Let's say, for sake of example, that Android implemented an API that put the phone to sleep for a fraction of a second to conserve battery life when nothing was moving on the screen. The API prototype for such a function might look like SystemClock.sleep(millis) where the parameter "millis" is the number of milliseconds to put the device to sleep for.While Google is right in saying all this, the compatibility concerns are unfounded in this particular case, as we pointed out earlier.
If one phone manufacturer implemented SystemClock.sleep() incorrectly, and interpreted the parameter as Seconds instead of Milliseconds, the phone would be put to sleep a thousand times longer than intended! This manufacturer's phone would have a terrible time running Google Maps. If apps don't run well across devices due to incompatibilities, consumers would leave the ecosystem, followed by developers. The end of the virtuous cycle.
As expected Google and Andy Rubin's response did not go well with Alibaba, which was already not happy with the smartphone cancellation and John Spelich, Alibaba's VP of international corporate affairs, came out in strong words and even questioned the openness of Android:
Aliyun OS is not part of the Android ecosystem so of course Aliyun OS is not and does not have to be compatible with Android. It is ironic that a company that talks freely about openness is espousing a closed ecosystem.It may not be totally right, but Alibaba raises a valid point.
This is like saying that because they own the Googleplex in Mountain View, therefore anyone who builds in Mountain View is part of the Googleplex. Will someone please ask Google to define Android?
What is Android and how much of it is Google?
There are currently many Androids floating all around us. The Amazon Android in Kindle Fire, or Barnes & Noble's Android in Nook Tablet or several such and then there's Google's Android, which has access to Google Play and other Google services and can use the Android logo.
The whole point of providing Android source under Apache v2 Open Source license is such that Android will rise every day and that is the beauty of the Android Open Source Project (AOSP).
But, it is high time Google made a clear distinction. The so-called compatible Android or Google's Android, needs to called that and the AOSP Android needs a separate name, as Marketing Land pointed out in a recent article.
Recent actions like renaming Android Market to Google Play are crying out loud for such change.
But, the war of words did not stop at Alibaba's statement, Andy Rubin replied to Spelich's comments on Google+ and also raised the piracy issue:
Hey John Spelich -- We agree that the Aliyun OS is not part of the Android ecosystem and you're under no requirement to be compatible.But, why is Google so adamant on making Aliyun compatible with Android, or stopping Acer from launching an Aliyun smartphone? Probably, because it can see that Android, which is currently the biggest smartphone OS in China, is going to lose the top spot, courtesy operating systems like Aliyun. Remember Google's search competitor Baidu also introduced Yi OS last year, which is similar to Aliyun and also based on AOSP Android (or more politically correct Linux-based).
However, the fact is, Aliyun uses the Android runtime, framework and tools. And your app store contains Android apps (including pirated Google apps). So there's really no disputing that Aliyun is based on the Android platform and takes advantage of all the hard work that's gone into that platform by the OHA.
So if you want to benefit from the Android ecosystem, then make the choice to be compatible. Its easy, free, and we'll even help you out. But if you don't want to be compatible, then don't expect help from OHA members that are all working to support and build a unified Android ecosystem.
Despite being derived from the Android code, all these operating systems are not Android (or let's say not compatible with Android) but are emerging as the biggest competitors for Google's Android in China. Google does not want that thus all this brouhaha over a smartphone launch.
Posts
Thank you for reaching out to us. We are happy to receive your opinion and request. If you need advert or sponsored post, We’re excited you’re considering advertising or sponsoring a post on our blog. Your support is what keeps us going. With the current trend, it’s very obvious content marketing is the way to go. Banner advertising and trying to get customers through Google Adwords may get you customers but it has been proven beyond doubt that Content Marketing has more lasting benefits.
We offer majorly two types of advertising:
1. Sponsored Posts: If you are really interested in publishing a sponsored post or a press release, video content, advertorial or any other kind of sponsored post, then you are at the right place.
WHAT KIND OF SPONSORED POSTS DO WE ACCEPT?
Generally, a sponsored post can be any of the following:
Press release
Advertorial
Video content
Article
Interview
This kind of post is usually written to promote you or your business. However, we do prefer posts that naturally flow with the site’s general content. This means we can also promote artists, songs, cosmetic products and things that you love of all products or services.
DURATION & BONUSES
Every sponsored article will remain live on the site as long as this website exists. The duration is indefinite! Again, we will share your post on our social media channels and our email subscribers too will get to read your article. You’re exposing your article to our: Twitter followers, Facebook fans and other social networks.
We will also try as much as possible to optimize your post for search engines as well.
Submission of Materials : Sponsored post should be well written in English language and all materials must be delivered via electronic medium. All sponsored posts must be delivered via electronic version, either on disk or e-mail on Microsoft Word unless otherwise noted.
PRICING
The price largely depends on if you’re writing the content or we’re to do that. But if your are writing the content, it is $60 per article.
2. Banner Advertising: We also offer banner advertising in various sizes and of course, our prices are flexible. you may choose to for the weekly rate or simply buy your desired number of impressions.
Technical Details And Pricing
Banner Size 300 X 250 pixels : Appears on the home page and below all pages on the site.
Banner Size 728 X 90 pixels: Appears on the top right Corner of the homepage and all pages on the site.
Large rectangle Banner Size (336x280) : Appears on the home page and below all pages on the site.
Small square (200x200) : Appears on the right side of the home page and all pages on the site.
Half page (300x600) : Appears on the right side of the home page and all pages on the site.
Portrait (300x1050) : Appears on the right side of the home page and all pages on the site.
Billboard (970x250) : Appears on the home page.
Submission of Materials : Banner ads can be in jpeg, jpg and gif format. All materials must be deliverd via electronic medium. All ads must be delivered via electronic version, either on disk or e-mail in the ordered pixel dimensions unless otherwise noted.
For advertising offers, send an email with your name,company, website, country and advert or sponsored post you want to appear on our website to advert @ alexa. ng
Normally, we should respond within 48 hours.